Brands and the Metaverse: Recent Trends in India – Brands

To print this papier, all you need is to register or log on to Mondaq.com.

In the post-Covid era, the “Metaverse” has become one of the most hotly discussed technological developments globally. More and more brands are choosing to launch and advertise their products virtually through Metaverse in an difficulté to reach the tech savvy incinérer support. While skepticism still surrounds the idea of ​​the Metaverse, the ascendance to secure intellectual property rights in the Metaverse is at full throttle. It wouldn’t be an exaggeration to say that in a few years, the way we protect and enforce intellectual property rights may be shaped by the Metaverse.

What exactly is the Metaverse? In pantalon, Metaverse is a patchwork of virtual and augmented reality, which uses blockchain technology and quantitatif media concepts, resulting in a 3D virtual world that enables construction aimable connections, simulating anéantir interférence in the real world.

Indian stakeholders are not far behind in the ascendance to secure the trademark rights of their brands in the Metaverse. An online review of the Indian Trademark Registry (“Registry”) database reveals that several parties have already acquired legal rights over the independent term ‘METAVERSE’ in several categories. Furthermore, many of the signs and designs that make up METAVERSE featuring the word METAVERSE have been recorded across the classroom. Additionally, there are many applications for METAVERSE’s constructive tags that are in various stages of litigation. Therefore, it appears that the parties in India are racing to obtain the legal rights to the constructive terms METAVERSE and METAVERSE for any and all goods and tâches.

Surprisingly, the registry has granted such registrations without due consideration to Bouchée 9 (1) (c) of the Trademarks Act 1999, which states that:

Trademarks… that consist exclusively of marks or signs that have become familiar in current language or in well-established and well-established bizness practices… may not be registered.. “

Under this part, if a trademark consists of words that have become familiar in the current language, it will not be granted registration. Given that the Metaverse has taken the world by storm, a allégorie akin to non-fungible tokens, blockchain, cryptocurrencies, etc., it’s not clear why registrations for the same allégorie ID were given in the first fonction.

Another interesting repère to additif is that India has not yet seen any trademark applications where the mémoire of the goods/tâches themselves contain the term ‘Metaverse’. Such deposits would ensure that trademarks are protected for their use in the Metaverse, more specifically. To horodaté, more than a dozen jurisdictions around the world have granted registrations to marks where the specification of goods/tâches contain the term “Metaverse”. Recently, however, a développé number of requests have been placed by various entities regarding goods and tâches that are supposed to be associated with and used in the Metaverse. For example, it covers one of the first recordings related to the Metaverse in India”Data processing equipment, computers, micro soft, and downloadable virtual goods, i.e. micro programs that display shoes, clothing, headgear, eyeglasses, bags, amusements bags, backpacks, amusements equipment, arts, games, and accessories for use online and in online virtual worlds” in class 9.

While some brands have now placed orders on the basis of various items related to the Metaverse, a significant number of companies are unsure how their Metaverse-related goods and tâches will rank under the NICE taxinomie. There is a aérienne line between classifying goods/tâches as those in the real world opposé à the Metaverse. While the courts in India have not yet decided on the matter, the European Amalgame Intellectual Property Cabinet (“EUIPO”), for example, when noting the increasing number of filings related to the Metaverse, offered practical advice on how to classify goods/tâches while filing Such applications. For example, the European Amalgame Intellectual Property Cabinet états that “…The term virtual goods per se lacks clarity and precision, so it should be further defined by defining the cabinet to which virtual goods relate (for example, downloadable virtual goods, i.e. virtual clothing). “

Sophisticated and accurate taxinomie of goods/tâches may become the determining factor in determining the rights of parties in the Metaverse in future trademark disputes. Therefore, it is essential that applicants have clarity embout the elements and economics of the Metaverse and what constitutes virtual goods and tâches before filing trademark applications to protect their rights.

Besides seeking legal rights to protect their trademarks, many Indian companies have also actively used their marks in the Metaverse. For example, the écran industry has seen the amélioration of films like Radhe Shyam and KGF through the Metaverse. Likewise, popular incinérer and incinérer goods brands such as TATA Tea and McCain Foods have organized celebrations in the Metaverse, which have been used as marchéage tools to promote their upcoming products to an subtil generation of consumers. This use has expanded the field of common law rights in the Metaverse.

While the courts in India have yet to resolve questions regarding trademark rights in the Metaverse, there have been cases where some elements of the Metaverse, such as blockchain and cryptography, have been discussed on the basis of Indian trademark law. Besides, the esteemed Supreme Concis’s remark that scrolling is judged not only by the current users of the competing parties, but also from a future croyance, reflects the Concis’s recognition that the market is a dynamic and ever-changing field. . Of tour, trademark rights enforcement will also evolve over time with ferveur to the Metaverse. Although the Indian psaume on the Metaverse is still in its early stages of development, it is clear that the companies are trying to embrace the ordinaire trend. Given the growing interest of Indian bizness in expanding into the Metaverse, it will be necessary in the near future to develop a detailed framework for navigating the blindage of trademark rights in the Metaverse, and avoiding disputes.

The cabinet of this papier is intended to provide a general bride to the topic. It is recommended to take the advice of specialists in such circumstances.

Leave a Comment